The University of Arizona Press

Peer review procedure

The University of Arizona Press upholds rigorous standards of scholarship by employing the process of peer review to evaluate and strengthen all manuscripts that are published. Adhering to the guidelines outlined in the Association of University Press’s Best Practices in Peer Review, the imprint of the University of Arizona Press signifies that the work has undergone a meticulous peer review process before reaching publication.

Our peer review procedure unfolds as follows: after the acquisitions editor’s initial evaluation for editorial fit and quality is completed, they will move forward to peer review of the project. Leveraging their own expertise, they identify qualified individuals and seek input from the author as well on possible reviewers. After compiling a list of potential reviewers, the acquisitions editor, with the assistance of an editorial assistant, initiates email inquiries until they secure the commitment of two willing peer reviewers. Reviewers are expected to submit their evaluations within six to eight weeks and receive a modest honorarium in either cash or University of Arizona Press books upon finishing their evaluation.

Both proposals and complete manuscripts undergo peer review at the University of Arizona Press. For proposals, editors seek feedback from three reviewers, with a subsequent round of peer review required upon manuscript completion. Two positive peer reviews recommending publication are required at the manuscript stage before final acceptance. The review process can be an iterative process in which revision and further review may be required.

Our approach to selecting peer reviewers is thoughtful and inclusive. Recognizing the importance of diverse perspectives, we actively seek feedback from individuals with varied backgrounds, both inside and outside the academy, and spanning all stages in their careers.

With positive and substantive reviews, an acquisitions editor may request a response letter and advance the project to the Publication Committee for contract approval. For series books, the acquisitions editor seeks feedback and a letter of support from the series editors as well. A docket for each peer-reviewed and accepted book project is shared with the University of Arizona Press Editorial Advisory Board, and members have the opportunity to ask questions, ask for further review, or offer other guidance.